Legal Opinion

Concannon v. Oregon Portland Cement Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 1968PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.

This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries plaintiff claims to have sustained in 1964 as a result of breathing cement dust while working at defendant’s cement plant. Defendant appeals from a judgment entered on a verdict in favor of plaintiff.

Plaintiff worked for defendant as a machinist for 17 years prior to 1964. Defendant rejected coverage under the Workmen’s Compensation Act. As a part of his work plaintiff was required to make repairs inside *4dust collectors in which cement dnst produced in the cement manufacturing process was collected. To prevent the inhalation of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Freeman v. Wentworth & Irwin, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Blust v. Pacific Telephone Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Kruse v. Coos Head Timber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Cox v. Al Peirce Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1965

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. KriseOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Moyer v. Morysville Body Works, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API