Legal Opinion

Blust v. Pacific Telephone Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1906PublishedCited by 10 opinions

From Multnomah: Alfred F. Sears, Jr., Judge. John A. Blust appeals from a judgment of nonsuit in an action for damages brought by him against the Pacific States Telephone & Telegraph Co.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Bean

This is an action to recover damages for a personal injury received by the plaintiff while in the employ of the defendant. On October 13, 1903, he was engaged with other employees in putting up a telephone cable in the City of Portland, and while at work was knocked or thrown from the pole upon which he *35was working to tbe ground by tbe cable falling and striking him. The cable was about 1,000 feet long, and consisted of 100 pairs of copper wires incased in a sheathing of lead, and weighed from two to three pounds to the linear foot. It was brought to the place of work wound on a reel, and the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Indiana Car Co. v. ParkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. St. Louis Cordage Co. v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
  3. Wagner v. PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Brown v. Oregon Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Nutt v. Southern Pacific Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1894

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Freeman v. Wentworth & Irwin, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Filkins v. Portland Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Hagermann v. Chapman Timber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Brundage v. Southern Pac. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Cox v. Al Peirce Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1965

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API