Legal Opinion · Dissent

Moyer v. Morysville Body Works, Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 11, 1969No. Appeal, No. 261Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion by

Hoffman, J.:

This is an appeal from a denial of benefits under The Pennsylvania Occupational Disease Act, P. L. 566, No. 284, §101 et seq., 77 P.S. §1201 et seq.

The facts are set out fully and succinctly in the opinion of Commissioner Geer of the Workmen’s Compensation Board:

“The claimant was first employed by the defendant, Morysville Body Works, Inc. on April 1, 1957 as a spray painter in the truck body painting division. He worked there continuously until December 13, 1962 when he was forced to leave his employment because of total disability from aplastic anemia which…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Glodenis v. American Brass Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
  2. Underwood v. National Motor Castings Division, Campbell, Wyant & Cannon Foundry Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Aleutian Homes v. FischerAlaska Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Mills v. Detroit Tuberculosis SanitariumMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Metz v. Quakertown Stove WorksSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API