Legal Opinion

Marshall v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 27, 1992No. 49A05-9203-CR-89PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUCKER, Judge.

Ronald Marshall appeals his conviction for public indecency,1 a Class A misdemeanor. On appeal Marshall raises three issues for our review:(1) Was the evidence sufficient to support the conviction?(2) Does the alleged defect in the charging Information amount to fundamental error?(3) Did Marshall receive ineffective assistance of counsel?

We affirm.

The record before us reveals on August 8, 1991, Rick Dwenger was working as an undercover officer for the Indianapolis Police Department. In the evening hours on that date Officer Dwenger was sitting in his pickup truck parked at City…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Lawrence v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Burr v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Williams v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Barger v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1992

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Fields v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Dickenson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Vaillancourt v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Wine v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Glover v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API