Legal Opinion

Williams v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1987No. 1284S475PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHEPARD, Chief Justice.

The attorney who represented appellant Rodney Williams at trial sought to withdraw just ten days before trial. Although the court denied the motion, counsel did nothing to prepare for trial during the following five days and did not present evidence on behalf of his client. Williams claims that he received ineffective assistance of counsel in violation of the Sixth Amendment. He is correct. ©

Williams was convicted of robbery, a class A felony, Ind.Code § 85-42-5-1 (Burns 1979). He was sentenced to an enhanced term of forty years in prison. His conviction was affirmed on…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States of America Ex Rel. Countee Williams v. John J. Twomey, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
  3. Magley v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Terry v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Lawrence v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1984

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Weatherford v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
  2. French v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Spranger v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Canaan v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Roche v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API