Legal Opinion

Hudson v. City of Lincoln

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 1935No. 29367PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Eldred, District Judge.

This is a compensation case. It appears that the appellant, Pat Hudson, at the time of the accident involved herein, was employed by the appellee, city of Lincoln, cleaning a sewer. He claims that while thus employed, on the morning of July 8, 1933, he sustained an injury to his right eye. The sewer cleaning job was being done by winches, cable, blocks and bucket. The terminal winches were set up over the manholes leading from the surface to the sewer. At the bottom of each manhole, and in the sewer, was a block through which the cable was pulled. On July 8, 1933, in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Saxton v. Sinclair Refining Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Mullen v. City of HastingsNebraska Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Sherman v. Great Western Sugar Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Tucker v. Paxton & Gallagher Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Cunningham v. Armour & Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Meester v. SchultzNebraska Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Porter v. Brinn-Jensen Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1936
  5. O'Connor v. AbbottNebraska Supreme Court · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API