Mullen v. City of Hastings
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtEberly, J.
This, is a proceeding instituted by Harriet Louise Mullen, widow of Harley Mullen, deceased, under the workmen’s compensation law. Comp. St. 1929, secs. 48-101 et seq. Upon trial in the district court for Adams county, judgment was entered for the plaintiff. Defendant city appeals.
The deceased, approximately 49 years of age, was employed as a member of the fire department of the defend*173ant, city of Hastings, and was on duty as such at the time of his death. About 10 o’clock p. m. on June 17, 1931, this fire department had been summoned to Ingleside, Nebraska, by the discovery of a fire in some…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Travelers Insurance v. OhlerNebraska Supreme Court · 1929
- Bartlett v. EatonNebraska Supreme Court · 1932
- Southern Surety Co. v. ParmelyNebraska Supreme Court · 1931
- Omaha & Council Bluffs Street Railway Co. v. JohnsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1922
- Siedlik v. Swift & Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1931
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Shamp v. Landy Clark Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1938
- Pixa v. Grainger Bros.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1943
- Kirkpatrick v. Chocolate Sales Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1934
- Ottens v. Western Contracting Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1941
- Bell v. DentonNebraska Supreme Court · 1939
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.