Legal Opinion

Morrison v. State Highway Commission

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1960PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHowell, J.

(Pro Tempore)

Plaintiffs, construction contractors, sued the state of Oregon through the State Highway Commission for certain additional costs arising out of the construction of approximately five miles of highway in Wallowa county. Plaintiffs assert they are entitled to additional compensation because of unusual or unexpected conditions encountered during the construction of this highway within the purview of the “Changed Conditions” clause of their contract with the highway commission.

The ease was tried by the court without a jury, and findings of fact, conclusions of law and judgment were…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1951
  2. De Armas v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1947
  3. Carman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958
  4. State Ex Rel. Sinclair Provision Co. v. Warren Construction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Ryland v. RylandOregon Supreme Court · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bignold v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  2. DeLong Corporation v. Oregon State Highway Com'nDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1964
  3. New Pueblo Constructors, Inc. v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  4. A. Teichert & Son, Inc. v. State of Cal.California Court of Appeal · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API