Legal Opinion
Carman v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided October 8, 1958No. 116-52PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LITTLETON, Judge.
Plaintiff seeks to recover additional compensation for extra work performed in reclearing certain areas in connection with its contract to clear an area in the vicinity of the Heyburn Dam Project. Plaintiff contends that it is entitled to the extra compensation on the ground that the order to reclear the area in question amounted to a change under Article 3 of the contract, or in the alternative, that the flood which occurred on May 19,1949, and which occasioned the extra work, was a changed condition within the meaning of Article 4 of the contract. Defendant urges that…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- De Armas v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1947
- Tacoma Dredging Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1917
3Cited by10 opinions
- J. D. Hedin Construction Company, Inc., for Its Own Use and for the Use of Fischbach & Moore, Its Sub-Contractor v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- H.L.C. & Associates Construction Company, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
- Perini Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- Daewoo Engineering & Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Turnkey Enterprises, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.