Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Johnson

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided December 19, 2012No. 2 CA-CV 2012-0076PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOWARD, Chief Judge.

¶ 1 Appellant Rose Gravino appeals from the trial court’s order denying her petition to enforce the community property provisions of a decree of dissolution entered in May 2005, claiming the court erred in interpreting the provisions. She also appeals from the court’s order awarding appellee Edwin Johnson attorney fees, claiming the court erred by not providing a statutory basis for the award in its order. For the following reasons, we affirm in part and reverse in part.

Factual and Procedural Background

¶ 2 The underlying facts and procedural background are…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Trantor v. FredriksonArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Musa v. C. K. Adrian, M. D.Arizona Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Orfaly v. Tucson Symphony SocietyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  4. Castillo v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
  5. Ezell v. QuonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Brumett v. MGA Home Healthcare, LLCCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
  2. Camasura v. CamasuraCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
  3. In Re the Marriage Of: Bollermann v. NowlisArizona Supreme Court · 2014
  4. In Re Marriage of DougallCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
  5. Moreno v. BeltranCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API