Legal Opinion
iLOR, LLC v. Google, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided January 11, 2011No. 2010-1117, 2010-1172PublishedCited by 57 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DYK, Circuit Judge.
iLOR, LLC (“iLOR”) appeals from an order of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky finding this case exceptional under 35 U.S.C. § 285 and awarding attorneys’ fees and costs and expenses. iLOR, LLC v. Google, Inc., No. 5:07-CV-109, Doc. 93, 2009 WL 3367391 (E.D.Ky. Oct.15, 2009). This decision was based on a finding that iLOR’s proposed construction of claim 26 of U.S. Patent No. 7,206,839 (“'839 patent”) was baseless, and that iLOR knew or should have known that the Google Notebook product did not infringe its patent. Id. at *4
Because we hold…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. BurrSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Professional Real Estate Investors, Inc. v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- DePuy Spine, Inc. v. Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- In Re Seagate Technology, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Octane Fitness, LLC v. Icon HealthSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Octane Fitness, LLC v. ICON Health & Fitness, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Cullinane v. Uber Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2018
- Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. v. W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Eon-Net LP v. Flagstar BancorpCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.