Legal Opinion

DePuy Spine, Inc. v. Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided June 1, 2009No. 2008-1240, 2008-1253, 2008-1401PublishedCited by 168 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LINN, Circuit Judge.

Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. and Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc. (collectively “Medtronic”) appeal from a final judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts. DePuy Spine, Inc. v. Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc., No. 01-CV-10165 (D.Mass. Dec.11, 2007). The district court denied Medtronic’s ensnarement defense after a jury found that Medtronic had infringed U.S. Patent No. 5,207,678 (“the '678 patent”) under the doctrine of equivalents and awarded $226.3 million in lost-profit damages to DePuy Spine, Inc. and Biedermann Motech GmbH…

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. United States v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by168 opinions

  1. I4i Ltd. Partnership v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
  2. Uniloc USA, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
  3. Apple Inc. v. Motorola, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
  4. Arctic Cat Inc. v. Bombardier Recreational Products Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
  5. Amgen Inc. v. F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009

163 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API