Legal Opinion
Cullinane v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided June 25, 2018No. 16-2023PPublishedCited by 102 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge.
*55 This case concerns the enforceability of an arbitration clause contained in an online contract. Plaintiffs-Appellants Rachel Cullinane, Jacqueline Núñez, Elizabeth Schaul, and Ross McDonagh, (collectively, "Plaintiffs"), filed this putative class action in Massachusetts Superior Court on behalf of themselves and other users of a ride-sharing service in the Boston area against Defendant-Appellee Uber Technologies, Inc. ("Uber"). In their complaint, Plaintiffs alleged that Uber violated a Massachusetts consumer-protection statute by knowingly imposing certain…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Scherk v. Alberto-Culver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Rent-A-Center, West, Inc. v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by102 opinions
- Mitch Oberstein v. Live Nation Ent'm't, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
- Rivera-Colon v. AT&T Mobility Puerto Rico, IncCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019
- Waithaka v. Amazon.com, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2020
- Bekele v. Lyft, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019
- Godun v. Justanswer LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025
97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.