Legal Opinion
Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. v. W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided June 14, 2012No. 2010-1510PublishedCited by 86 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge GAJARSA. Opinion coneurring-inpart and dissenting-in-part filed by Circuit Judge NEWMAN.
GAJARSA, Circuit Judge.
I. Introduction
In deciding the present appeal, this court determined that the United States *1005District Court for the District of Arizona (“trial court”) was correct in its judgment and affirmed all of the conclusions reached by the trial court. See Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. v. W.L. Gore & Assocs., Inc., 670 F.3d 1171 (Fed.Cir.2012). The appellant, W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc. (“Gore”), timely filed a petition for rehearing and rehearing…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Miller v. FentonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Professional Real Estate Investors, Inc. v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by86 opinions
- Halo Electronics, Inc. v. Pulse Electronics, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Wbip, LLC v. Kohler Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Power Integrations, Inc. v. Fairchild Semiconductor International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Meyer Intellectual Properties Ltd. v. Bodum, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Carnegie Mellon University v. Marvell Technology Group, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.