Legal Opinion

State v. Vannoy

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided April 22, 1993No. 1 CA-CR 91-0351PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CONTRERAS, Judge.

In this case, we decide whether the state must provide a breath sample to a defendant charged with driving under the influence of alcohol when the defendant has given a deficient sample in the breath test, but the state still uses the test results at trial. Defendant David Allen Yannoy was convicted following a jury trial of one count of aggravated driving under the influence of alcohol, a class 5 felony. He appeals from his conviction and from the trial court’s order suspending imposition of sentence and placing him on probation for three years. He raises the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. California v. TrombettaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Baca v. SmithArizona Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Montano v. Superior Court Pima CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1986

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. MacK v. CruikshankCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  2. State v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
  3. State v. SanchezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
  4. State Ex Rel. Verburg v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
  5. State v. RumseyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API