Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Verburg v. Jones

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided November 1, 2005No. 1 CA-SA 05-0187PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LANKFORD, Judge.

¶ 1 The State brought this special action to challenge a ruling excluding evidence of a defendant’s refusal to perform field sobriety tests from a trial for driving under the influence (“DUI”). By prior order, we accepted jurisdiction and granted relief, with an opinion to follow. This opinion explains why we granted relief.

¶ 2 The special action is from a superior court ruling on appeal from a municipal court DUI conviction. Defendant was charged with two DUI counts: driving while impaired in violation of Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 28-1381(A)(l)…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Bevins v. Peoples Bank & Trust Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State v. PalenkasCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
  4. McCormick v. Municipality of AnchorageCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2000
  5. State v. KrantzCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Amundsen v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  2. State v. BuellIdaho Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Carrillo v. HouserCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  4. Carrillo v. HouserCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  5. State of Arizona v. Francisco L. Encinas ValenzuelaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API