State Ex Rel. Verburg v. Jones
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANKFORD, Judge.
¶ 1 The State brought this special action to challenge a ruling excluding evidence of a defendant’s refusal to perform field sobriety tests from a trial for driving under the influence (“DUI”). By prior order, we accepted jurisdiction and granted relief, with an opinion to follow. This opinion explains why we granted relief.
¶ 2 The special action is from a superior court ruling on appeal from a municipal court DUI conviction. Defendant was charged with two DUI counts: driving while impaired in violation of Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 28-1381(A)(l)…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1986
- Bevins v. Peoples Bank & Trust Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. PalenkasCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
- McCormick v. Municipality of AnchorageCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2000
- State v. KrantzCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Amundsen v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- State v. BuellIdaho Court of Appeals · 2008
- Carrillo v. HouserCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- Carrillo v. HouserCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- State of Arizona v. Francisco L. Encinas ValenzuelaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.