Legal Opinion

Montano v. Superior Court Pima County

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1986No. 18186-PRPublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*386GORDON, Vice Chief Justice.

‘We accepted review of this petition after the Court of Appeals declined to accept jurisdiction of a Petition for Special Action arising from the trial court’s determination of two issues: whether A.R.S. § 28-691 (the Implied Consent statute) requires all police departments to provide some form of alcohol testing to those arrested for Driving Under the Influence of Intoxicating Liquor (DWI); and whether, when no alcohol test is provided, police must inform those arrested for DWI of their right to an independent chemical test. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Ariz.…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. California v. TrombettaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Breithaupt v. AbramSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Giles v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. State v. LaGrandArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State v. RiveraArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State v. YoungbloodArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. RosengrenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
  5. Snyder v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1996

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API