Legal Opinion

Loeh v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided June 28, 2002No. 01-486CPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

MILLER, Judge.

This case is before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss or, alternatively, for summary judgment. The issue to be decided is whether plaintiff is entitled to judgment amounting to the immediate issuance of military retirement pay from the United States Department of the Navy (the “Navy”) pursuant to 10 U.S.C. §§ 629, 632, 642, and 6323 (2000). Alternative issues to decided are whether the Navy violated its own regulations for processing retirement requests; the Administrative Procedure Act (the “APA”), 5 *3U.S.C. § 551 (2000); or plaintiffs right under the Constitution.…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ogden v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
  2. Nalette v. StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  3. Loeh v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
  4. Loeh v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
  5. Shibayama v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API