Legal Opinion
Huu Nam Tran v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company Kwok Lam
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided May 25, 2005No. 04-2539PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
AMBRO, Circuit Judge.
Huu Nam Tran appeals from the District Court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (“MetLife”), in connection with a complaint filed by Tran alleging that he was misled by MetLife’s agent as to the number of years he was obligated to pay premiums on a life insurance policy he purchased. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
I. Factual Background and Procedural History
Tran was born in Vietnam and came to the United States in 1979. He alleged in his complaint that he does not speak or read English well, and he…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Standard Venetian Blind Co. v. American Empire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Yocca v. Pittsburgh Steelers Sports, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Bortz v. NoonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Collister v. Nationwide Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- The Medical Protective Company v. William WatkinsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Hunt v. United States Tobacco Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- In Re: Citx Corporation, Inc., Debtor. Gary Seitz, Chapter 7 Trustee for Citx Corporation, Inc. v. Detweiler, Hershey and Associates, P.C. Robert Schoen, C.P.ACourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
- Whitaker v. Herr Foods, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
- Baker v. FAMILY CREDIT COUNSELING COPR.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
- Bair v. PurcellDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.