Legal Opinion

Hutchinson v. Cleveland-Cliffs Iron Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 20, 1905No. Docket No. 71PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Error to Delta; Stone, J. Case by John Hutchinson against the Cleveland-Cliffs Iron Company for personal injuries. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

The plaintiff was injured by falling through a hatchway in defendant’s chemical works. The machinery of these works consisted of a number of large steel or iron and copper cylinders, called “stills,” and vats and necessary pipes. The defendant had been making alterations and an enlargement of its plant by increasing the number of cylinders, and had employed the JohnsManville Company, of Milwaukee, to cover some of its cylinders and pipes with plastic covering, and the plaintiff was employed by that company to do this work under its foreman. This work was confined to the easterly portion of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Schmidt v. BauerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Kennedy v. ChaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Victory v. . BakerNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  4. Doggett v. Illinois Central R. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1872
  5. Murray v. McLeanIllinois Supreme Court · 1870

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Pettyjohn & Sons v. BashamSupreme Court of Virginia · 1919
  2. Heritage Broadcasting Co. v. Wilson Communications, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Southwest Cotton Co. v. PopeArizona Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Meeks v. CowartCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  5. Constantineau v. Dci Food Equipment, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API