Legal Opinion

Torres v. Madsen

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided February 12, 2015No. 20131028-CAPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum Decision

DAVIS, Judge:

{1 Douglas L. Madsen, Emma Sill Crid-dle, and Doug and Emmy's Family Restaurant and Café, Inc. (collectively, Defendants) appeal the district court's denial of their motion to reconsider the dismissal of their counterclaim for attorney fees. We affirm.

{2 In June 2008, Anthony B. Torres and Yvette Torres brought a complaint against Defendants seeking to enforce a Letter of Intent in which Defendants agreed to sell their restaurant to the Torreses. Relying on the Letter of Intent, the Torreses retained an attorney to prepare a Purchase Agreement. However,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hooban v. Unicity International, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Bilanzich v. LonettiUtah Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. GreenUtah Supreme Court · 2003
  4. State v. DANIEL BAGLEY ROGERSUtah Supreme Court · 2006

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Utah Department of Transportation v. Boggess-Draper Co.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2016
  2. Hark’n Technologies, Inc. v. Orange Whip Fitness X, LLCDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2026
  3. Torres v. MadsenCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2015
  4. Utah Department of Transportation v. Boggess-Draper Co.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API