Legal Opinion

Broad & Branford Place Corp. v. J. J. Hockenjos Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided September 15, 1944PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Heher, J.

The essential question here is whether a landlord’s refusal to sanction the subletting of the demised premises and the use thereof for a purpose not authorized by the lease was “unreasonable,” and therefore a breach of covenants obliging the tenant to devote the premises to a particular use and not to sublet or underlet them, without the landlord’s consent.

The granting clause of the lease provided that the premises were “to be used and occupied for the business” thereinafter specified, “and for no other use or business whatsoever (except with…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sarner v. KantorNew York Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Butterick Publishing Co. v. Fulton & Elm Leasing Co.New York Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Amfac, Inc. v. Waikiki Beachcomber Investment Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Kendall v. Ernest Pestana, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Courbat v. Dahana Ranch, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Fernandez v. VazquezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  5. Elliott v. RoachIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API