Legal Opinion

Sarner v. Kantor

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1924PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtProskauer, J.

Defendant lessor moves to dismiss the lessee’s complaint for insufficiency in law. The lease provided: “Fourth. That the tenant shall not assign or sublet this agreement, or under-let or underlease the premises * * * without the landlord’s written consent first had and obtained * * *. Nothing herein contained shall permit the landlord to unreasonably withhold his consent to any sublease.” Plaintiff alleges unreasonable refusal to consent to a sublease and demands damages and the return of the deposit under the lease.

Plaintiff cannot recover unless this 4th clause is a covenant by defendant…

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. Broad & Branford Place Corp. v. J. J. Hockenjos Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1944
  2. Kruger v. Page Management Co.New York Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Kendis v. CohnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  4. Ogden v. Riverview Holding Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Butterick Publishing Co. v. Fulton & Elm Leasing Co.New York Supreme Court · 1928

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API