Legal Opinion

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Jepsen

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 10, 2002No. 633 Disciplinary Docket 3PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ZAPPALA, Chief Justice:

This disciplinary matter presents the issue of whether our Court has the authority to disbar a district justice for misconduct 'in the practice of law. We hold that we possess such authority pursuant to Article V, Section 10(c) of the Pennsylvania Constitution, which grants our Court the exclusive power to supervise the conduct of attorneys. The fact that the Court of Judicial Discipline is also authorized to discipline judicial officers pursuant to Article i V,' Section 18 of our Constitution in- no way abrogates the constitutionally conferred powers of this…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Riedel v. HUMAN REL. COM'N OF READINGSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. In Re Assignment of AvellinoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. In Re FranciscusSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. In Re IuloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  5. In Re HasaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Buffalo Township v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. In re BrunoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. In Re MelograneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Commonwealth v. FieldsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  5. In Re ToczydlowskiCourt of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · 2004

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API