Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Fields

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 17, 2018No. 1069 WDA 2016; No. 445 WDA 2016PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION IN SUPPORT OF AFFIRMANCE BY BENDER, P.J.E.:

Appellants, Keith Fields and Gerald Howard Davis, Jr., appeal from the judgments of sentence imposed after they were resentenced following their original sentences being vacated on collateral review. Fields and Davis contend that the post-conviction court lacked jurisdiction to vacate their sentences, and resentence them, at certain counts for which they had completed their sentences or received no further penalty. After careful review, we affirm.

The facts of Fields' and Davis' underlying convictions are not pertinent to our disposition of…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Alleyne v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. Illinois v. VitaleSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Commonwealth v. AllenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Com. v. Davis, G.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
  2. Com. v. Kirwan, P.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  3. Com. v. Bieber, E.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
  4. E. Allen Reeves v. Old York, LLCSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
  5. Com. v. Bieber, E.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API