Legal Opinion

Stetina v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1976No. 40473PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, C. J.

This case involves an action to recover medical payments coverage under two policies of insurance issued by the defendant, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (hereinafter referred to as State Farm), to the plaintiff in the total amount of $10,000. After the plaintiff had filed his amended petition, the defendant demurred. Defendant subsequently withdrew its demurrer and filed an answer to the plaintiffs petition. The defendant then moved for summary judgment. The District Court sustained defendant’s motion for summary judgment and overruled the plaintiff’s motion for a new trial.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Home Insurance Company v. Pinski Brothers, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1972
  2. DeCespedes v. Prudence Mut. Cas. Co. of Chicago, Ill.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
  3. Graham v. RockmanAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Bernardini v. Home & Automobile InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965
  5. Pendlebury v. Western Casualty and Surety Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1965

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Mahler v. SzucsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Mahler v. SzucsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Winters v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Winters v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  5. McCurry v. School District of ValleyNebraska Supreme Court · 1993

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API