Winters v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtChambers, J.
— We are asked to determine whether a personal injury protection insurer should pay a pro rata share of the legal cost incurred by the insured when, by pursuing an underinsured motorist tortfeasor, the insured created a fund from which the personal injury protection insurer recoups benefits previously paid on behalf of its insured. We conclude that the efforts of the Petitioners created a common fund from which the personal injury protection insurance company benefited. We therefore affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals and remand for the trial court to determine the pro rata share of…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Mahler v. SzucsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Mahler v. SzucsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Bowles v. Department of Retirement SystemsWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- Dayton v. Farmers Insurance GroupWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- Britton v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1985
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Matsyuk v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2012
- Hamm v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- Hamm v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
- Sherry v. Financial Indem. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
- Sherry v. Financial Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.