Legal Opinion

Daniel Clark Medberry v. James Crosby

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided November 25, 2003No. 02-11072, 02-15808PublishedCited by 212 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLACK, Circuit Judge:

These consolidated appeals arise from Appellant Daniel Clark Medberry’s habeas corpus petitions challenging two separate prison disciplinary actions against him. The district court denied both petitions. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c), this Court granted a certificate of appealability (COA) on very limited issues as to each petition. We now vacate the district court’s judgment in appeal number 02-15808 and remand with instructions to dismiss the petition as moot. We affirm the district court in appeal number 02-11072.

I. BACKGROUND

Appellant is an inmate at Union…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
  2. Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Felker v. TurpinSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. United States v. HaymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  5. Jimmy Walker v. J.T. O'brien, and Joseph W. Finfrock v. Craig A. HanksCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by212 opinions

  1. Frantz v. HazeyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  2. Joel White v. John Lambert, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  3. John D. Dupree v. Warden, Attorney General, State of AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2013
  4. Hayward v. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  5. Rice v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011

207 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API