Legal Opinion
Hayward v. Marshall
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 22, 2010No. 06-55392PublishedCited by 274 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge KLEINFELD; Concurrence by Judge BERZON.
KLEINFELD, Circuit Judge:
We address three issues: 1) whether a certificate of appealability is needed to appeal a district court’s order denying a writ of habeas corpus arising out of a state’s denial of parole; 2) whether federal constitutional law imposes on the states a requirement for some quantum of evidence to support a state’s denial of parole; and 3) whether, even if there is no general federal quantum of evidence requirement, applicants for parole in California, under the state’s current laws, may obtain federal habeas review of…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by274 opinions
- Swarthout v. CookeSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Florencio Dominguez v. Scott KernanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Destinni Mardesich v. Matthew CateCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- In Re: Terrence Wright v.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2016
- Roberts v. HartleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
269 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.