Legal Opinion

State v. Heartfield

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 7, 2000No. 2CA-CR99-0161-PRPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRAMMER, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 In this petition for review of the denial of post-conviction relief, filed pursuant to Rule 32, Ariz. R.Crim. P., 17 AR.S., petitioner Allistaire Quenton Heartfield challenges the trial court’s rejection of his claim that it lacked jurisdiction to order him to pay restitution because he was found guilty except insane under A.R.S. § 13-502. We agree with Heartfield and grant relief.

¶ 2 Pursuant to a plea agreement, Heart-field was found guilty except insane of the charge of attempted arson of an occupied structure. Pursuant to A.R.S. §§ 13-3994, 13-701, and 13-604,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. WorlockSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
  2. People v. SerravoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  3. State v. CorleyArizona Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Pouncey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  5. State v. WilsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. TuomalaOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. SaenzCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
  3. State of Arizona v. Thomas Giles ConnollyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  4. State v. BomarCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
  5. State v. RomeroCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API