Legal Opinion

State of Arizona v. Thomas Giles Connolly

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided August 8, 2007No. 2 CA-CR 2006-0095PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ESPINOSA, Judge.

¶ 1 Following a jury trial, appellant Thomas Connolly was convicted of robbery, a class four felony. The trial court imposed a slightly mitigated sentence of two years, to be served concurrently with a slightly mitigated, 7.5-year sentence in another matter. The court ordered Connolly to pay attorney fees in the amount of $800, a $25 indigent defense fee, and a $20 time-payment fee in monthly installments upon his release from prison. The sole issue Connolly raises on appeal is whether the trial court erroneously imposed the $20 time-payment fee pursuant to A.R.S. §…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. SepahiArizona Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State v. RoscoeArizona Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. OehlerkingCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
  4. State v. HeartfieldCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. Moreno-MedranoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  2. State v. PayneCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  3. State v. DustinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
  4. In Re Mh-2008-000867Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  5. State of Arizona v. Luis Alberto Moreno-MedranoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API