Legal Opinion

Pouncey v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided September 19, 1983No. [No. 135, September Term, 1982.]PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMurphy, C. J.

Cole, J., concurs in the result.

The issue before us is whether a defendant in a criminal case properly can be found both guilty of a crime and insane at the time of its commission.

Appellant was charged with first degree murder of her five-year-old son. She interposed pleas of not guilty and insane at the time of the commission of the crime. The evidence at the nonjury trial in the Circuit Court for Howard County disclosed that the appellant drowned her son because she believed that the devil was pursuing him and that the only way to prevent him from going to hell was to kill him. The evidence…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Langworthy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  2. Supervisor of Assessments v. Southgate HarborCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  3. Young v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1972
  4. American Legion, Clopper Michael Post 10, Inc. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Shell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  2. Commonwealth v. TrillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Hoey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  4. Treece v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  5. Anderson v. Department of Health & Mental HygieneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API