Napa Union High School District v. Board of Supervisors
California Court of Appeal
PROCEEDINGS on application for a Writ of Mandate to require the issuance of school bonds. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
An application was made in the first instance to this court for a writ of mandate to require respondents to issue the bonds of said High School District in the sum of three hundred thousand dollars “for the purpose of purchasing a suitable high school lot, building thereon a new high school building, supplying said high school building with furniture and necessary apparatus and improving the high school grounds.” In response to the alternative writ respondents have filed herein a demurrer to the petition, and an answer in which is challenged on various grounds the legality of the bond…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gibson v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Pacheco v. BeckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1877
- State ex rel. Mitchell v. StevensSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880
- Hollywood Union High School District v. KeyesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
- Leary v. JonesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1911
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Wright v. JordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Casmalia School District v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Oliver v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924