Legal Opinion

Tidal Oil Co. v. Hudson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 24, 1923No. 14150PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

This is an appeal from an order refusing to vacate a default judgment. The facts which gave rise to this action are as follows:

In June, 1915, William B. Hudson brought an action against Okla Oil Company, now the Tidal Oil Company, plaintiff in error, and C. D. Webster Oil Company. The Webster Oil Company was dropped out of the suit, and the cause went to trial against the Okla Oil Company November, 1015. Hudson introduced his evidence and rested, the Okla Oil Company demurred to the evidence, and the judge took the demurrer under advisement, but later went out of office without passing on the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Philip Carey Co. v. VickersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. LambertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Bahnsen v. GilbertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  4. Carter v. GrimmettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. Franklin v. FranklinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Leslie v. SpencerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  2. Dardenne v. DanielsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  3. Bride v. BrideSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API