Legal Opinion
Dardenne v. Daniels
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 18, 1936No. 25749PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPhelps, J.
There is much discussion of many propositions in this appeal, but after prolonged study of the case we find that it is only necessary to determine whether the order appealed from should be sustained on the doctrine of laches. With that idea in mind, we make the following statement of only the necessary facts in such a way as to give the plaintiff in error.the benefit of every doubt on those issues which are disputed :
On November 4, 1920, the plaintiff (plaintiff in error here) filed suit in the district court against J. A. Daniels, Scott A. Year-gain, J. S. Cheyne, and two other parties,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Galliher v. CadwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Johnston v. Standard Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
- McDonald v. HoveySupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Smick's Admr. v. Beswick's Admr.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1902
- Dardenne v. DanielsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bechler v. KayeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
- Gardner v. Incorporated City of McAlesterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
- Baker v. DeichmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Van Antwerp v. SchultzSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
- Swartz v. DennisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.