Legal Opinion
Binney v. San Dimas Lemon Assn.
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 7, 1927No. Docket No. 4563PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHouser, J.
The salient facts in this appeal appear to be that George A. Binney was the owner of a citrus grove and that he executed and delivered a mortgage thereon, in- eluding the “rents, issues and profits,” to Edwin 0. Kennard and Flora H. Kennard. The indebtedness secured by the mortgage not having been paid, suit was brought to foreclose the mortgage, and somewhat later a receiver in the action was appointed by the court. Between the time that the suit was commenced and the date of the appointment of the receiver the defendants in that action picked fruit from the mortgaged premises and delivered…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Havemeyer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Freedman's Saving & Trust Co. v. ShepherdSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Kountze v. Omaha Hotel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Cowdery v. London Etc. BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Simpson v. FergusonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Mortgage Guarantee Co. v. SampsellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Casey v. DohertyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- McAllister v. MetzgerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- First National Bank of Tulare v. AndreasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Hill v. First Nat. Bank of PorterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931