Legal Opinion
BURNDY CORPORATION v. Cahill
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided August 4, 1961No. Civ. 4-61-Civ.-78PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DEYITT, Chief Judge.
This is a motion for a preliminary injunction (1) to enjoin defendant Cahill from remaining in the employ or aiding in any manner defendant National Connector or any other firm or corporation in the business of manufacturing or selling electrical connectors and (2) to enjoin defendant National Connector from employing defendant Cahill or using any advice or information received from Ca-hill. Jurisdiction is based on diversity of citizenship and claimed amount in controversy.
A statement of the facts as shown to the court by affidavits is necessary for an understanding of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- KVOS, Inc. v. Associated PressSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Thelma M. Wade, as Administratrix of the Estate of Russell L. Smith, Deceased v. Dan Rogala, Doing Business as Rogala FisheriesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1959
- Food Fair Stores, Inc. v. Food Fair, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1949
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Premier Industrial Corporation v. Texas Industrial Fastener Company, Ed Roos, Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- Dieter Hulsenbusch v. The Davidson Rubber Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
- Basicomputer Corp. v. ScottDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1991
- Burndy Corporation v. F. L. Cahill and National Connector CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
- Schneider, Hill & Spangler, Inc. v. CudmoreDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.