Legal Opinion
Schneider, Hill & Spangler, Inc. v. Cudmore
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided January 20, 1971No. Civ. No. 14123PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION and DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
BLUMENFELD, District Judge.
I. Facts
The essential facts of this case are not in dispute. Plaintiff Schneider, Hill & Spangler, Inc. (SHS) is a franchisor engaged in the business of licensing franchisees to use the “services and registered service mark and name [of SHS] in order to build [their] own local business [es] as * * * independent personnel consultant [s] and employee placement specialist [s].” 1 Plaintiff and defendant Kenneth H. B. Cud-more entered into two separate contracts, each entitled…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. Arnold, Schwinn & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Horton v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Checker Motors Corporation v. Chrysler Corporation and Chrysler Motors Corporation, Checker Taxi Company, Inc., Additional on CounterclaimCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- Billy Baxter, Inc. v. The Coca-Cola Company and Cana Da Dry CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Frankel v. Stein and Day, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1979
- John Lemmon Films, Inc. v. Atlantic Releasing Corp.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1985
- Alesayi Beverage Corp. v. Canada Dry Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- Gillette Company v. WilliamsDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1973