Legal Opinion
Spaulding Osborne v. Pacific Employers Ins. Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 2, 1943No. 31156PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDavison, J.
This is an original proceeding instituted in this sort for the purpose of obtaining a review of an order of the State Industrial Commission. The respondent Edward Hutch-ings was an employee of Spaulding & Osborne, petitioners herein. On April 14, 1942, he received an accidental personal injury arising out of his employment. It is undisputed in this proceeding that the injury was compensable under the Workmen’s Compensation Act.
A claim was filed before the State Industrial Commission by the injured claimant. The respondents before the commission were Spaulding & Osborne, employers, and Pacific…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Union Indemnity Co. v. SalingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Farmers Gin Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Tri-State Casualty Ins. Co. v. BowenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
- R. S. Smith Construction Co. v. NewcombSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Tri-State Casualty Co. v. SpeerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Red Rock Mental Health v. RobertsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
- Barney U. Brown & Sons, Inc. v. SavageSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
- WB Johnston Grain Company v. SelfSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
- Pine, Adm'r v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
- Hefley v. Neely Insurance Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.