Legal Opinion

In re the Personal Restraint Petition of Fogle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 2, 1995No. 62191-8PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDolliver, J.

— Following this court’s decision in In re Mota, 114 Wn.2d 465, 472, 788 P.2d 538 (1990), holding the Department of Corrections’ (DOC) denial of earned early release credit to presentence detainees in county jails violated equal protection, the Legislature amended the sentencing statute to authorize the county jails to establish earned early release credit policies. RCW 9.94A. 150(1). Now we are asked to review the constitutionality of those county jail policies: presentence detainees receive earned early release credit, but less than that available under DOC policy. We hold county jail…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. PhelanWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Mota v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Matter of Personal Restraint of WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  4. In Re AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Matter of Personal Restraint of CromeenesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. In re the Personal Restraint of SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  2. In Re SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  3. In re the Personal Restraint of CrowderCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
  4. MacFarlane v. WalterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  5. Petition of FogleWashington Supreme Court · 1995

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API