Legal Opinion
MacFarlane v. Walter
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 5, 1999No. 97-35725PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The panel has voted to deny Appellees’ petition for rehearing. Judge Reinhardt and Judge Graber have voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc and Judge Skopil has recommended denying the petition for rehearing en banc.
The opinion is amended as follows:(1) At Slip Op. 4197, second paragraph, line 4:
“one-third” is changed to “one-quarter”(2) At Slip Op. 4197, second paragraph, line 6:
“two days” is changed to “three days”(3) At Slip Op. 4198, top paragraph; line 1:
“two-thirds” is changed to “three-quarters” and the citation to In re Williams is deleted(4) At Slip Op. 4198, top…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Picard v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Donald Eugene Lambert v. James Blodgett, Donald Eugene Lambert v. James BlodgettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Tuan Van Tran v. Gary Lindsey, Warden Salinas Valley State Prisons State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- David Duhaime v. Kenneth DucharmeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Clinton K. Lajoie v. S. Frank Thompson, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary, No. 98-35919Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- In re the Personal Restraint of SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1999
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.