Legal Opinion

Matter of Personal Restraint of Cromeenes

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided January 6, 1994No. 32190-1-IPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaker, J.

Chad Cromeenes challenges the constitutionality of Skagit County Jail's good-time policy, which allows only 5 days' "good time” for every 30 days served. He further challenges the policy of precluding inmates who face potential prison sentences from earning an additional 5 days' "earned time" per 30 days served. We find no constitutional violation, and deny relief.. Facts

Cromeenes was convicted of two counts of second degree burglary and one count of robbery. He was sentenced to a 17-month term on the burglary convictions and a consecutive 13- month term on the robbery conviction. He filed…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. McGinnis v. RoysterSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Harmon v. McNuttWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Mota v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Matter of Personal Restraint of WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Personal Restraint Petition of FogleWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Petition of FogleWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  3. In re the Personal Restraint of AtwoodCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API