Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Dole v. Chattabriga

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided July 12, 1926PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarble, J.

A petition for instructions is a well-established method of settling disputed claims against a bank in process of liquidation (Kimball v. Norton, 59 N. H. 1; Bank Commissioners v. Trust Co., 75 N. H. 107), and the court, under its general equity jurisdiction, has power to determine the rights of the parties on such petition (Wheeler v. Perry, 18 N. H. 307; Goodhue v. Clark, 37 N. H. 525, 531; Petition of Baptist Church, 51 N. H. 424).

While the two departments of a trust company are not always treated as separate entities (Guaranty Trust Co. v. Company, 79 N. H. 480, 488), it was clearly the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lippitt v. Thames Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1914
  2. Commissioner of BanksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  3. Bachrach v. Commissioner of BanksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  4. Upham v. BramwellOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Bieringer-Hanauer Co. v. Cosmopolitan Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bassett v. City Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
  2. In Re the Liquidation of the Home InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008
  3. McAllister v. ElliotSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1928
  4. Reichert v. Farmers' & Workingmen's Savings BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Stanley v. ClarkDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API