Reichert v. Farmers' & Workingmen's Savings Bank
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] Certified questions from the Jackson circuit court arising upon petition of receiver of defendant bank for directions to govern administration of his trust.
First question: "Under section 11928, 3 Comp. Laws 1929, must the investments of the savings department of a State bank be held solely for the benefit of savings depositors?"
Answer: Yes.
The statute cited is in part:
"Any bank combining the business of a commercial bank and a savings bank, and operating an…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Foster v. RowMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
- Bissell v. HeathMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
- Commissioner of BanksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
- Sherwood v. Central Michigan Savings BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
- Upham v. BramwellOregon Supreme Court · 1922
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- American State Bank v. AaronMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
- Reichert v. Fidelity Bank & Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1932
- Detroit Trust Co. v. AllingerMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
- Cooper v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1934
- Hodgell v. WildeWyoming Supreme Court · 1937
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.