Legal Opinion

Holzer v. Jochim

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1996No. Civil 960061PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANDSTROM, Justice.

Paul Holzer appeals from an amended judgment dismissing with prejudice his action against Kenneth Jochim. We hold the trial judge, successor to the judge who presided over the original trial, abused his discretion in redetermining liability issues without affording the parties an opportunity for a new trial. We, therefore, reverse and remand for .a new trial on all issues.

I

Holzer sued Jochim in September 1993, claiming the two were partners in a pizza business and Jochim committed fraud and breached the agreement. Holzer sought dissolution of the partnership, an accounting,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Shipley v. ShipleyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Paulson v. MeinkeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Estate of Robertson Ex Rel. Robertson v. Cass County Social ServicesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  4. North Shore, Inc. v. WakefieldNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  5. McComb v. AboelessadNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Blanchard v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Gratech Co., Ltd. v. WOLD ENGINEERINGNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Fode v. Capital RV Center, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Binder v. BinderNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Gratech Co., Ltd. v. WOLD ENGINEERINGNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API