Legal Opinion
North Shore, Inc. v. Wakefield
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided January 30, 1996No. Civil 950278PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEVINE, Justice.
North Shore, Inc., appeals from an order denying its Rule 60(b), NDRCivP, motion for relief from judgment. We affirm.
The judgment at issue quieted title in certain land to Daniel V. Wakefield and Luella M. Schafer and awarded Wakefield and Schafer damages and costs. We affirmed the judgment in North Shore, Inc. v. Wakefield, 530 N.W.2d 297 (N.D.1995). The basic facts underlying this case are reported in that opinion and will be repeated only as necessary to resolve the issues raised in this appeal.
In the judgment from which North Shore seeks relief, the trial court found that…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Twelve John Does v. District of Columbia Appeal of Edwin A. Meese, Iii, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
- Jefferis v. East Omaha Land Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
- First National Bank of Crosby v. BjorgenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- City of Wahpeton v. Drake-Henne, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
- In Re Estate of JensenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Grinaker v. GrinakerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- Huber v. Oliver CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Krizan v. KrizanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Doyle v. SprynczynatykNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Nord v. HerrmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.