Legal Opinion

Fode v. Capital RV Center, Inc.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1998No. Civil 970240PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sandstrom, Justice.

[¶ 1] Coachmen Recreational Vehicle Co. and Capital RV Center, Inc., (defendants) appealed from a judgment entered upon a jury verdict granting Albert and Birdie Fode revocation, of their acceptance of a motor home, finding Coachmen breached its warranty to Fodes, and awarding Fodes damages, and from an order denying the defendants’ motion for judgment as a matter of law or for a new trial. Fodes cross-appealed from the judgment. We hold Fodes were entitled to revoke acceptance of the motor home against both defendants, and the jury verdict is supported by substantial…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Durfee v. Rod Baxter Imports, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. Conte v. Dwan Lincoln-Mercury, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
  3. Gasque v. Mooers Motor Car Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1984
  4. Seekings v. Jimmy GMC of Tucson, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Ventura v. Ford Motor Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Siewert v. SiewertNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Neal v. SMC Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2003
  3. T.F. James Company v. VakochNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  4. In Re Estate of DionNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Holverson v. LundbergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API