Fode v. Capital RV Center, Inc.
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Sandstrom, Justice.
[¶ 1] Coachmen Recreational Vehicle Co. and Capital RV Center, Inc., (defendants) appealed from a judgment entered upon a jury verdict granting Albert and Birdie Fode revocation, of their acceptance of a motor home, finding Coachmen breached its warranty to Fodes, and awarding Fodes damages, and from an order denying the defendants’ motion for judgment as a matter of law or for a new trial. Fodes cross-appealed from the judgment. We hold Fodes were entitled to revoke acceptance of the motor home against both defendants, and the jury verdict is supported by substantial…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Durfee v. Rod Baxter Imports, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Conte v. Dwan Lincoln-Mercury, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- Gasque v. Mooers Motor Car Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1984
- Seekings v. Jimmy GMC of Tucson, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1981
- Ventura v. Ford Motor Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Siewert v. SiewertNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Neal v. SMC Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2003
- T.F. James Company v. VakochNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- In Re Estate of DionNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Holverson v. LundbergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.