Legal Opinion

United States v. Mobay Chemical Corp.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 18, 1978No. 77-24PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Market, Chief Judge.

The Government appeals from summary judgment of the United States Customs Court, 78 Cust. Ct. 1, C.D. 4685, 435 F. Supp. 1217 (1977), sustaining Mobay Chemical Corporation’s (Mobay’s) classification protest relating to imported urethane pastes.1 The Customs Court held that proper classification was under item 405.25, TSUS, as “Plastics materials.” We reverse and remand.

Issues

The decisive issue is whether the Customs Court erred in determining the absence of genuine issue of material fact. A second issue is whether the Customs Court lacked jurisdiction in three cases…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Drakenfeld & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  2. Englishtown Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977
  3. Volkswagen of America, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972
  4. De Ronde v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910
  5. Illfelder v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Janex Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1978
  2. A. Giurlani & Bros. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1985
  3. Keuffel & Esser Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983
  4. Mitsui Petrochemicals (America), Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997
  5. Sealed Air Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API