Legal Opinion

State v. Fritz

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 1, 1988No. 1 CA-CR 10342, 1 CA-CR 11731-PRPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JACOBSON, Presiding Judge.

The sole issue raised by this appeal is whether the provisions of Rule 32, Rules of Criminal Procedure, dealing with “newly discovered evidence” are available to set aside a plea of guilty entered pursuant to North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 91 S.Ct. 160, 27 L.Ed.2d 162 (1970).

Appellant/defendant, Anthony Charles Fritz, pled guilty by way of Alford in 1986 to one count of attempted sexual conduct with a minor in the second degree in violation of A.R.S. § 13-1405, a class 3 felony. The defendant was sentenced on June 12, 1986, to lifetime probation with…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. State v. LeonArizona Supreme Court · 1969
  4. State v. BishopCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  5. State v. McFordCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. EngramCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
  2. State v. FontaineSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1989
  3. State of Arizona v. Kenneth Wayne Thompson IIArizona Supreme Court · 2022
  4. Washington v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  5. State v. CrockerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API