Legal Opinion

State v. Fontaine

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided May 31, 1989No. 88-257-C.APublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WEISBERGER, Justice.

This case comes before us on the appeal of Arthur Fontaine (applicant) from the denial of his application for postconviction relief pursuant to G.L.1956 (1985 Reenactment) § 10-9.1-1. We vacate the denial and remand for further proceedings. The facts upon which this application must be determined are as follows.

On August 81, 1982, the applicant was sentenced to ten years’ imprisonment after being convicted of sexual assault in the third degree in violation of G.L.1956 (1981 Reenactment) § 11-37-6, and commission of the abominable and detestable crime against nature…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. State v. FengSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1980
  3. State v. CollazoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1982
  4. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1987
  5. State v. EstradaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. GarciaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Mattatall v. StateSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2008
  3. Fontaine v. StateSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1992
  4. Ferrell v. WallSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2005
  5. McMaugh v. StateSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1992

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API